The Development of Trial by Jury: Reading Answers & Explanations

IELTS Reading practice test · 14 questionsAcademicmedium

Haven't taken this test yet?

Looking at the answers first spoils the practice — you only get one honest first attempt at a passage. Take the test with the 20-minute timer, get an instant score and estimated band, then come back here to study every answer.

About this passage

The passage opens: In many countries today, a person accused of a serious crime may be judged not by professional officials but by a group of ordinary citizens chosen from the community. This institution, known as trial by jury, is often regarded as a cornerstone of justice, a safeguard that places the fate of the accused in the hands…

  • Passage length: about 741 words
  • Questions: 14
  • Question types: True / False / Not Given, Multiple Choice, Short Answer

The Development of Trial by Jury” is an original IELTS-style practice passage written by IELTS-Bank. It is not taken from an official IELTS or Cambridge test, so these answers only apply to our version.

Answer key at a glance

Show the quick answer list (questions 1–14)
  1. 1. FALSE
  2. 2. TRUE
  3. 3. FALSE
  4. 4. TRUE
  5. 5. NOT GIVEN
  6. 6. FALSE
  7. 7. B
  8. 8. B
  9. 9. C
  10. 10. B
  11. 11. trial by ordeal
  12. 12. the neighbourhood
  13. 13. evidence
  14. 14. in private

The Development of Trial by Jury answers with explanations

Questions 1–6: True / False / Not Given

Do the following statements agree with the information given in the passage? Write TRUE, FALSE or NOT GIVEN.

  1. 1

    The modern jury system was created all at once by a single reform.

    Show answer

    Answer: FALSE

    Why: This sentence directly contradicts the statement, so the answer is FALSE.

    Evidence · Paragraph 1
    …the jury as we know it was not designed all at once; it developed slowly over many centuries, and its role changed profoundly along the way.
  2. 2

    Trial by ordeal assumed that a higher power would protect the innocent.

    Show answer

    Answer: TRUE

    Why: This sentence confirms the statement, so the answer is TRUE.

    Evidence · Paragraph 2
    …an accused person might be made to undergo a painful or dangerous test... on the belief that a higher power would protect the innocent and reveal the guilty.
  3. 3

    The earliest jurors were chosen because they knew nothing about the case.

    Show answer

    Answer: FALSE

    Why: This sentence directly contradicts the statement, so the answer is FALSE.

    Evidence · Paragraph 3
    …the members of the jury were not neutral strangers hearing evidence for the first time, but local people who were expected to know something about the case or the parties involved.
  4. 4

    In a modern jury trial, the judge decides questions of law.

    Show answer

    Answer: TRUE

    Why: This sentence confirms the statement, so the answer is TRUE.

    Evidence · Paragraph 5
    …the professional judge presides over the proceedings and rules on questions of law, but it is the jury that decides what actually happened.
  5. 5

    Juries reach their verdicts more quickly than professional judges do.

    Show answer

    Answer: NOT GIVEN

    Why: The statement claims that juries reach verdicts more quickly than professional judges, but the passage neither confirms nor denies this, focusing instead on the jury's role and evolution in the justice system.

  6. 6

    The use of juries is the same in every legal system.

    Show answer

    Answer: FALSE

    Why: This sentence directly contradicts the statement, so the answer is FALSE.

    Evidence · Paragraph 7
    …the use of juries varies considerably from one legal system to another, and in some places their role has been limited to only the most serious cases.

Question 7: Multiple Choice

Choose the correct letter, A, B, C or D.

Options
  • A. as impartial strangers
  • B. as more like witnesses than judges
  • C. as trained legal officials
  • D. as representatives of the state
  1. 7

    How were the earliest jurors best described?

    Show answer

    Answer: B — as more like witnesses than judges

    Why: This is the part of the passage that supports B — as more like witnesses than judges.

    Evidence · Paragraph 3
    In effect, the earliest jurors were more like witnesses than judges, drawing on their own knowledge of local affairs to reach a decision.

Question 8: Multiple Choice

Choose the correct letter, A, B, C or D.

Options
  • A. jurors came to be expected to know the facts personally
  • B. jurors were expected to approach a case with an open mind, judging only on the evidence
  • C. jurors were replaced by professional judges
  • D. jurors were required to give reasons for their verdicts
  1. 8

    How did the understanding of the jury's role change over time?

    Show answer

    Answer: B — jurors were expected to approach a case with an open mind, judging only on the evidence

    Why: This is the part of the passage that supports B — jurors were expected to approach a case with an open mind, judging only on the evidence.

    Evidence · Paragraph 4
    The jury came to be seen instead as a body that should approach a case with an open mind, forming its verdict solely on the basis of evidence presented in court.

Question 9: Multiple Choice

Choose the correct letter, A, B, C or D.

Options
  • A. because it makes trials cheaper
  • B. because ordinary citizens have legal training
  • C. because it acts as a check on the power of the state and officials
  • D. because it speeds up the legal process
  1. 9

    Why do supporters value the involvement of ordinary citizens in trials?

    Show answer

    Answer: C — because it acts as a check on the power of the state and officials

    Why: This is the part of the passage that supports C — because it acts as a check on the power of the state and officials.

    Evidence · Paragraph 6
    The involvement of ordinary citizens is seen as a check on the power of the state and of professional officials, making it harder for the authorities to secure a conviction against the conscience of the community.

Question 10: Multiple Choice

Choose the correct letter, A, B, C or D.

Options
  • A. that juries are too small
  • B. that untrained citizens may struggle to understand complex evidence
  • C. that judges refuse to work with juries
  • D. that juries always agree with the state
  1. 10

    What is one criticism of trial by jury mentioned in the passage?

    Show answer

    Answer: B — that untrained citizens may struggle to understand complex evidence

    Why: This is the part of the passage that supports B — that untrained citizens may struggle to understand complex evidence.

    Evidence · Paragraph 7
    Some have questioned whether ordinary citizens, without legal training, are well equipped to understand complex evidence or complicated points of law.

Questions 11–14: Short Answer

Answer the questions below. Choose NO MORE THAN THREE WORDS from the passage for each answer.

  1. 11

    What was the name of the older method in which an accused underwent a painful test?(max 3 words)

    Show answer

    Answer: trial by ordeal (also accepted: ordeal)

    Why: The answer “trial by ordeal” is taken from this sentence — copy the word(s) exactly as they appear. It fits the 3-word limit.

    Evidence · Paragraph 2
    In one such method, known as trial by ordeal, an accused person might be made to undergo a painful or dangerous test.
  2. 12

    The earliest jurors were summoned because they were familiar with what?(max 3 words)

    Show answer

    Answer: the neighbourhood (also accepted: the case / local affairs / the neighborhood)

    Why: The answer “the neighbourhood” is taken from this sentence — copy the word(s) exactly as they appear. It fits the 3-word limit.

    Evidence · Paragraph 3
    They were summoned precisely because they were familiar with the neighbourhood and could speak to what they knew.
  3. 13

    In a modern trial, on the basis of what must the jury form its verdict?(max 3 words)

    Show answer

    Answer: evidence (also accepted: the evidence / evidence presented in court)

    Why: The answer “evidence” is taken from this sentence — copy the word(s) exactly as they appear. It fits the 3-word limit.

    Evidence · Paragraph 4
    …forming its verdict solely on the basis of evidence presented in court.
  4. 14

    Where does the jury typically discuss the case before delivering its verdict?(max 2 words)

    Show answer

    Answer: in private (also accepted: private)

    Why: The answer “in private” is taken from this sentence — copy the word(s) exactly as they appear. It fits the 2-word limit.

    Evidence · Paragraph 5
    …then delivers its verdict, typically after discussing the case in private.

Estimated band score for this test

Your raw score out of 14 scaled to the 40-question IELTS Reading (Academic) conversion table. This is the same estimate the practice page shows after you submit. A single passage is a small sample, so treat it as a guide.

Correct answersEstimated band
14 / 149.0
13 / 148.5
12 / 147.5
11 / 147.0
10 / 146.5
8–9 / 146.0
7 / 145.5
6 / 145.0
5 / 144.5
4 / 144.0
3 / 143.5
2 / 143.0
1 / 142.0
0 / 140.0

Full-test score? Use the IELTS band calculator.

Tips for the question types in this test

True / False / Not Given

  • Read the statement first and underline the key idea, especially any qualifiers like "all", "only", "never", "always", "more than" or dates and numbers.
  • Because the questions follow the order of the passage, scan for the paragraph that deals with the same topic rather than re-reading everything.

Common trap: Confusing "False" with "Not Given": choose False only when the passage actively contradicts the statement; if the passage is silent, it is Not Given.

Full True / False / Not Given strategy

Multiple Choice

  • Read the question stem carefully before the options so you know exactly what is being asked.
  • Because multiple-choice questions follow passage order, locate the relevant section and read it in full — the answer usually depends on more than one sentence.

Common trap: Distractors that use exact words from the passage but distort the meaning.

Full Multiple Choice strategy

Short Answer

  • Read the instructions and note the exact word limit; going over it means zero marks even if the meaning is right.
  • Turn each question into a set of keywords and predict what kind of answer it needs (a person, a date, a place, a noun).

Common trap: Exceeding the word limit (writing four words when only three are allowed).

Full Short Answer strategy

Practise “The Development of Trial by Jury” under exam conditions

Free, auto-marked, with the 20-minute timer and an instant band estimate.

Take this test first (timed)