Should Zoos Be Banned
IELTS Writing Practice — AI-Powered Feedback
Writing Prompt
Some people argue that keeping wild animals in zoos is cruel and that zoos should be closed. Others believe that zoos play an important role in education and in protecting endangered species.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Show Band 8–9 model answer
Whether zoos should continue to exist is a highly contentious issue. While critics insist that confining wild animals is inherently cruel, others argue that modern zoos are essential for conservation and education. In my view, poorly regulated, entertainment-focused zoos should be phased out, but well-managed conservation centres remain necessary.
Those who favour banning zoos emphasise animal welfare. Wild creatures are adapted to complex, expansive habitats, yet in many zoos they are kept in cramped enclosures that cannot replicate their natural environment. This often results in abnormal behaviours such as pacing or self-harm, a phenomenon known as “zoochosis”. Moreover, animals are frequently transported, separated from family groups and exposed to noisy crowds, all of which can cause chronic stress. From this perspective, no amount of educational benefit can justify what is effectively lifelong imprisonment for the animals involved.
Supporters of zoos, however, highlight their conservation role. For critically endangered species, captive breeding programmes have sometimes been the only barrier between survival and extinction. The recovery of the Arabian oryx and the California condor, for instance, was made possible largely through carefully managed zoo-based initiatives, followed by reintroduction into the wild. Additionally, zoos can raise public awareness by allowing people, especially children, to see animals up close. This direct contact can foster empathy and generate funding and political support for habitat protection projects worldwide.
In my opinion, the key issue is not whether animals are kept, but how and why. Traditional zoos primarily aimed at entertainment, with small cages and performing animals, are ethically indefensible and should indeed be closed. However, accredited institutions that provide large, enriched enclosures, focus on breeding endangered species, and contribute to scientific research and habitat restoration should be supported and tightly regulated. Ultimately, the long-term goal should be to make such centres unnecessary by protecting natural ecosystems so that animals can thrive in the wild, not behind glass.
Why this response works
This essay addresses all parts of the task, clearly outlining both sides and maintaining a consistent position that distinguishes between exploitative zoos and conservation-focused centres (Task Response). Ideas are logically sequenced, with clear paragraphing and cohesive devices used flexibly and naturally (Coherence and Cohesion). The vocabulary is varied and precise (e.g. “zoochosis”, “accredited institutions”, “chronic stress”, “reintroduction”), with accurate collocations. Grammatical structures are diverse, including conditionals and complex sentences, and errors are negligible (Lexical Resource; Grammatical Range and Accuracy). Overall, it exemplifies a high Band 8–9 performance.
Your Answer
Keep practising
Build consistency with another Writing practice item.