IELTS Writing Task 2: Should Second Languages Be Taught in Primary School?
IELTS Writing Practice — AI-Powered Feedback
Writing Prompt
Some educationalists argue that children should begin learning a foreign language in the first years of primary school, while others feel this age should be reserved for mastering their first language.
To what extent do you agree or disagree that a second language should be taught from an early age?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Show Band 8–9 model answer
Opinions differ as to whether young children should study a foreign language or focus exclusively on their mother tongue. In my view, introducing a second language in the early years of primary school is highly beneficial, provided it is implemented in a balanced and age-appropriate way.
Those who oppose early foreign-language instruction often argue that it may confuse children or slow the development of their first language. They worry that limited classroom time will be spread too thin, preventing pupils from acquiring strong literacy skills in reading and writing. For example, in some under-resourced schools, even basic numeracy and native-language literacy are not fully secure by the end of primary education, so adding another subject could seem unrealistic or even counterproductive.
However, research in linguistics and psychology suggests that young children are particularly receptive to new sounds and structures. Starting early takes advantage of this "critical period", allowing pupils to develop natural pronunciation and listening skills that are difficult to obtain later. In many European countries, such as the Netherlands or Sweden, foreign languages are introduced from the first years of schooling, and students typically reach a high level of fluency without any apparent harm to their competence in their mother tongue.
Moreover, learning another language from an early age can enrich rather than undermine first-language development. Activities such as songs, storytelling and simple games can draw children’s attention to how language works in general, making them more aware of grammar, vocabulary and meaning. This kind of metalinguistic awareness can support reading and writing in their native language. The key is that second-language lessons should be short, playful and well-integrated, not exam-driven or overly formal.
In conclusion, I strongly agree that a foreign language should be taught from the first years of primary school. When carefully designed, such programmes complement, rather than compete with, the mastery of a child’s first language and provide long-term academic and cultural advantages.
Why this response works
This essay would likely achieve a high band because it presents a clear position throughout, explicitly supporting early foreign-language learning while acknowledging concerns. The argument is well developed with specific explanations (critical period, metalinguistic awareness) and relevant examples (European systems, under-resourced schools). Ideas are logically organised with coherent paragraphing and cohesive devices used naturally. Vocabulary is varied yet precise, including some less common items used accurately. Grammatical structures are flexible and generally error-free, with a good mix of complex sentences and clear control of tense and agreement.
Your Answer
Keep practising
Build consistency with another Writing practice item.