The Effect of Humanity

IELTS Writing Practice — AI-Powered Feedback

Writing Prompt

Human activity has had a negative effect on plants and animal all over the world. Some people think that it is too late to do something about it. Others think that there is still time to take effective action. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Write at least 250 words.
Show Band 8–9 model answer

It is undeniable that human activity has caused severe damage to wildlife and ecosystems worldwide. While some argue that this damage is irreversible and that any effort would be futile, others insist that meaningful action can still be taken. I firmly believe that, although we cannot undo all the harm, there remains substantial scope for effective intervention.

Those who claim it is too late often point to the scale and permanence of the damage. Countless species have already become extinct through habitat destruction, overfishing and pollution. Once a species disappears, no law or technology can bring it back. Furthermore, climate change has triggered self-reinforcing processes, such as melting ice caps and ocean acidification, which may be beyond human control. From this perspective, conservation campaigns may appear symbolic rather than practical, diverting resources from more immediate human needs.

However, there is strong evidence that timely action can still protect and even restore many ecosystems. Numerous success stories exist: for instance, the recovery of the humpback whale population after strict whaling bans, or the regeneration of forests in Costa Rica following reforestation policies and eco-tourism. Advances in conservation science, such as captive breeding programmes and habitat corridors, have helped endangered species stabilise or increase in number. Moreover, policy tools like protected areas, sustainable fishing quotas and pollution controls have demonstrably slowed biodiversity loss when properly enforced.

In my view, acknowledging that some damage is permanent should motivate, not paralyse, our response. We may not save every species, but we can still prevent countless others from vanishing and preserve vital ecosystem services, such as pollination and clean water, on which human life depends. Rather than debating whether it is too late, governments and individuals should intensify conservation efforts now, because in environmental protection, partial success is vastly preferable to complete surrender.

Why this response works

This essay directly addresses the question, clearly outlining both viewpoints and presenting a consistent personal opinion. The position is explicit from the introduction and reinforced in the conclusion. Ideas are logically organised with clear paragraphing and strong cohesion, using a range of linking devices naturally. Arguments are extended with specific, relevant examples (whaling bans, Costa Rican forests), showing clear development. Lexical resource is varied and precise, with topic-appropriate vocabulary. Grammar demonstrates a wide range of complex structures with accurate control and only very minor slips, supporting a Band 8–9 level performance across all criteria.

Your Answer

0 / 250 words

Build consistency with another Writing practice item.

Advertising Aimed at Children

medium

Practise next

Agricultural Advancement

medium

Practise next

An Ageing Population

medium

Practise next