Growing Populations
IELTS Writing Practice — AI-Powered Feedback
Writing Prompt
Write at least 250 words.
Show Band 8–9 model answer
In many parts of the world, rapid population growth has put intense pressure on housing. Whether governments should build new homes in cities or in the countryside is a complex question. In my view, priority should be given to developing higher-density housing in existing urban areas, with only carefully controlled expansion into rural regions.
Building more homes in cities has several clear advantages. First, cities already possess essential infrastructure such as public transport, hospitals, schools and utilities. Concentrating new housing where these services are available is more efficient and reduces the cost to taxpayers. Second, urban housing can be built vertically, meaning more people can be accommodated on a smaller area of land. High-quality apartment blocks and mixed-use developments can provide sufficient living space without consuming valuable greenfield sites.
By contrast, constructing large numbers of homes in the countryside can have serious drawbacks. Expanding into rural areas often leads to urban sprawl, which destroys farmland and natural habitats. This not only threatens food security but also reduces biodiversity. Furthermore, people living in newly built rural estates frequently depend on private cars because public transport is limited. As a result, traffic congestion and carbon emissions increase, undermining environmental goals.
That said, some limited rural development may be necessary, especially in regions where cities are already overcrowded or geographically constrained. In such cases, governments should promote small, well-connected satellite towns rather than scattered housing estates. These communities should be planned with robust transport links and local employment opportunities to prevent them from becoming mere dormitory suburbs.
In conclusion, while carefully planned rural settlements can play a supporting role, governments should focus mainly on providing new homes within cities. Compact, well-designed urban development makes better use of existing infrastructure, protects the countryside and offers a more sustainable long-term solution to population growth.
Why this response works
This essay presents a clear, consistent position throughout, directly addressing the city versus countryside question. Ideas are logically organised with a clear progression: position, urban advantages, rural drawbacks, a balanced concession, and a strong conclusion. Cohesion is achieved through varied linking devices and referencing without overuse. Vocabulary is precise and topic-appropriate (e.g. “greenfield sites”, “urban sprawl”, “biodiversity”, “satellite towns”), and word choice is natural. Grammatical structures are varied and accurate, with complex sentences used flexibly and very few, if any, noticeable errors, making it a strong high-band sample.
Your Answer
Keep practising
Build consistency with another Writing practice item.