Government vs Individual Responsibility
IELTS Writing Practice — AI-Powered Feedback
Writing Prompt
Write at least 250 words.
Show Band 8–9 model answer
Whether environmental protection should be driven by individuals or led by governments and large corporations is widely debated. In my view, although major institutions hold the greatest power to effect large-scale change, their efforts will be incomplete and unsustainable without active participation from ordinary citizens.
On the one hand, governments and big companies clearly possess the resources and authority to tackle environmental problems at scale. National governments can pass and enforce laws limiting industrial emissions, banning harmful chemicals, and protecting forests and oceans. For instance, strict vehicle emission standards and carbon taxes can dramatically reduce national pollution levels in ways that personal choices alone never could. Likewise, multinational companies control vast supply chains; if they switch to renewable energy, redesign packaging, or adopt circular production systems, the environmental impact is immediate and far-reaching.
However, placing responsibility solely on these powerful actors is both unrealistic and risky. Individual behaviour directly contributes to environmental degradation through energy use, transport choices and waste generation. Simple actions—such as reducing meat consumption, choosing public transport, and minimising plastic use—collectively create significant demand for greener products and services. This consumer pressure often pushes companies to adopt sustainable practices faster than regulation alone.
Moreover, public attitudes shape political will. Governments are far more likely to introduce ambitious environmental legislation when voters are informed, engaged and willing to accept lifestyle changes. Grassroots campaigns, local recycling initiatives and community clean-up projects not only improve neighbourhoods immediately but also foster a culture that supports tougher environmental policy.
In conclusion, governments and large corporations must lead environmental efforts because they command the greatest capacity for change. Nevertheless, individual actions are indispensable for generating political pressure, shifting markets and embedding sustainability in daily life. Only when both levels of responsibility operate together can environmental protection be truly effective.
Why this response works
This essay would achieve a high band because it presents a clear, consistent position: large actors must lead, but individuals are indispensable. Task response is strong, with both sides of the debate addressed and extended through relevant, specific examples. Coherence and cohesion are enhanced by logical paragraphing, effective use of linker phrases, and a clear progression of ideas. Lexical resource is varied yet natural (e.g. “circular production systems”, “political will”, “grassroots campaigns”). Grammatical range and accuracy are high, with complex structures used flexibly and minimal error.
Your Answer
Keep practising
Build consistency with another Writing practice item.